Learned Whale · The study, the backtest, the forward test
We stopped copying their fills. We studied how they decide.
After one week of mirroring five whale wallets trade-for-trade, we asked a better question: not what did they buy, but how do they choose? This page is the whole study — the findings, the six candidate rules they produced, the backtest of those rules (including the part where the rules lose), and the new forward sim now testing them live, on paper, 15 seconds late like any real follower. Figures as of November 2, 2026.
How we got here
Paper research — not a copy feedThe raw material is our own copy sim: 43 closed mirrors and 6 still open, every one recorded with the whale's fill, our fill, the exit and the P/L — a record that cross-sums exactly to the sim's realized +$416.64, so the analysis stands on the same numbers published on the Copy Sim page. On top of that we pulled the live activity of the seven wallets this research has covered — 200 activity items each, 1,400 in total, in one clean pull with no rate-limit gaps. The wallets haven't been equally busy lately, so the windows differ (about 1 hour of activity for the busiest wallet, about 14 days for the quietest) — the study says so wherever it matters. What follows is behaviour, not signals: price bands, categories, exits, position-building and hedging, turned into rules we can test.
Finding 1 — the money is made in the middle
| Entry price band (our 43 closed mirrors) | Mirrors | W / L (win rate) | P/L | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Longshot — entry below 0.30 | 8 | 2 / 6 (25.0%) | +$135.04 | Positive only because of one trade: K27 at 0.14 (+$153.57). Without it: -$18.53 over 7 trades. |
| Mid-band — entry 0.30–0.65 | 23 | 16 / 7 (69.6%) | +$274.45 | The workhorse band — over half of all mirrors, and the best win rate that still pays. |
| Favourite — entry above 0.65 | 12 | 10 / 2 (83.3%) | +$7.15 | Wins paid +$0.08 to +$12.31; the two losses cost the full -$25.00 each. |
Favourites win often and pay almost nothing. Longshots pay fortunes and almost never win — our whole longshot profit is a single trade (K27, entered at 0.14). The mid-band is where a follower's money was actually made. And the wallets behave as if they know it: googleplay and monkeymashingkeyboard — two of the week's top earners — keep 100% of their live buys inside 0.30–0.65. googleplay placed 193 live buys, every single one in-band; 62 of them were $500+ conviction buys and 58 of those 62 were NBA.
Finding 2 — categories are not equal
| Category (our 43 closed mirrors) | Mirrors | P/L |
|---|---|---|
| CS2 (Counter-Strike 2) | 9 | +$216.40 |
| WTA tennis | 5 | +$55.25 |
| NBA | 5 | +$53.25 |
| NFL totals | 2 | +$46.89 |
| Soccer | 2 | +$37.58 |
| ATP tennis | 4 | +$7.46 |
| League of Legends | 12 | +$6.92 |
| Politics / futures | 4 | $-7.11 |
CS2 carried the esports record (+$216.40 over 9 mirrors, +$24.04 per mirror) while League of Legends filled the most slots and earned almost nothing (+$6.92 over 12, +$0.58 per mirror). Politics and futures were the only losing category — and tellingly, all four of those mirrors ended because the whale sold, not because the market settled. The category table may really be a wallet table (one wallet supplies nearly all the CS2), and the study flags that honestly: it is a hypothesis about skill, not proof about categories.
Findings 3–6 — exits, ladders, hedges, conviction
Nobody stop-losses sports. 39 of our 43 mirrors (90.7%) ended by market resolution, netting +$423.75. The only 4 exits where the whale sold first netted -$7.11 combined — all four were one wallet (BreakTheBank) trimming long-dated positions: -$5.26, -$1.47, -$1.09 and +$0.71. Median hold was about 5 hours overall, about 4 hours for resolved sports. Selling, for these wallets, is portfolio management on slow positions — not a reaction to a losing bet.
They ladder in. A whale's first buy is rarely the whole position: repeat buys on a single market ran to 74 fills (jakepaulthegoat2008), 75 (googleplay) and 168 (Abkhauae). Three of the wallets have never sold at all in the record — they size in and let settlement decide. Median single "conviction" buy ($500+): googleplay $8,547 · Abkhauae $7,559 · BreakTheBank $1,900 · jakepaulthegoat2008 $1,350 · monkeymashingkeyboard $1,309 · UpTheBlues $807.
Some buy both sides. UpTheBlues held both outcomes in 11 of his 52 live events. In our mirror record, three both-sides pairs netted +$27.26 taking both sides — but taking only the cheaper side of those same pairs would have netted +$60.59. Hedging is position management with their bankroll; for a $25 follower it mostly buys the expensive side of a coin flip.
And the certainty style fails its own test. The near-certainty method we run on the Certainty page — the style of the week's most famous grinder — is underwater in our own sim (-$61.25) despite a 96.63% win rate. What the whales taught us points the other way: mid prices, real uncertainty, held to settlement.
The candidate rules
| Rule | What it says | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| R1 — MID-BAND ONLY | Mirror only when our fill lands in 0.30–0.65. | STRONG — 23 mirrors in-band at 69.6% WR for +$274.45; two of the copied wallets keep 100% of their live buys in this band. |
| R2 — NO LONGSHOTS TO RESOLUTION | Skip fills below 0.30 unless the position is a long-dated future the whale actively manages with sells. | MODERATE — sub-0.30 is -$18.53 without the single K27 win; Abkhauae's managed longshots are the exception class. |
| R3 — CS2 FIRST | Within esports, weight CS2 over League of Legends. | MODERATE — CS2 +$216.40 over 9 mirrors vs LoL +$6.92 over 12; may be one wallet's skill rather than a category edge. |
| R4 — BOTH-SIDES PAIRS: TAKE ONLY THE CHEAPER SIDE | When a whale buys both outcomes of one event, mirror only the side priced at or below the other (in practice 0.55 or under). | WEAK-MODERATE — the pair sample is 3 both-sides pairs (+$27.26 taking both sides vs +$60.59 taking the cheaper side alone), directionally supported by the band logic. |
| R5 — HOLD SPORTS TO RESOLUTION; FOLLOW SELLS ONLY ON LONG-DATED POSITIONS | Mirror a whale SELL only when the market ends more than 7 days out. | MODERATE — 39 of 43 exits were resolutions (+$423.75); the 4 sell-exits netted -$7.11, all of them long-dated BreakTheBank positions. |
| R6 — FIRST BIG BUY IS THE SIGNAL; REPEAT BUYS ARE NOT NEW SIGNALS | Laddering is sizing, not fresh information. | MODERATE as a description of whale behaviour (repeat buys run to 74, 75 and 168 fills on single positions); untested as a pricing rule. |
The backtest — how we tested the rules
Backtest — simulated on historical data| Method | Detail |
|---|---|
| Starting bank | $1,000 per run and per slice |
| Stake | $25 flat per trade — the same size as the live paper sim |
| Entry prices | The sim's recorded fills: the whale's price at check time + 1¢ — approximations of the real book; a live follower fills later (see the Reality twins) |
| Exit prices | The sim's recorded exits: resolution at $1.00 / $0.00 per share, or the recorded sell price on whale-SELL exits |
| In-sample slice | Trades opened Oct 26–29, 2026 (38 trades) — the record the candidate rules were learned from |
| Out-of-sample slice | Trades opened Oct 30 – Nov 2, 2026 (5 trades, all opened Oct 31) — trades the rules never saw while they were being written |
| Max drawdown | Measured on cumulative P/L in the order the trades closed |
| Excluded | The 6 mirrors still open on Nov 2 — no exit yet, so no rule can be scored on them |
| Independence note | The mirror record and the raw whale feed describe the same underlying whale activity; the raw-feed replay is a cross-check, not independent confirmation |
In-sample vs out-of-sample, in plain words. In-sample is testing the rules on the same trades they were learned from — like practising on the actual exam questions. It flatters every rule, ours included. Out-of-sample is a fresh exam: trades that happened after the rules were written, that the rule-writing never saw. It is the only honest test — and ours is five trades small, which the results below make very clear.
| In-sample — opened Oct 26–29, 2026 (the rules were learned from these) | Trades taken | W / L | Win rate | Final balance | P/L | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BASE — the raw copy sim, unfiltered | 38 | 24 / 14 | 63.2% | $1,396.80 | +$396.80 | -$50.00 |
| R1 — mid-band only | 21 | 14 / 7 | 66.7% | $1,242.46 | +$242.46 | -$25.00 |
| R2 — no longshots to resolution | 31 | 21 / 10 | 67.7% | $1,236.76 | +$236.76 | -$75.00 |
| R3 — CS2-whitelist esports | 8 | 6 / 2 | 75.0% | $1,207.62 | +$207.62 | -$25.00 |
| R4 — cheaper side of pairs | 35 | 23 / 12 | 65.7% | $1,430.13 | +$430.13 | -$50.00 |
| COMBINED (R1 + R4) | 19 | 13 / 6 | 68.4% | $1,250.79 | +$250.79 | -$25.00 |
The honest catch — read this before the tables impress you. In-sample, the unfiltered copy sim ($1,396.80) beat every learned filter except the cheaper-side pair rule ($1,430.13). The reason is one trade: the filters skip the K27 longshot (+$153.57), which alone is 37% of the sim's total profit; without it the raw sim's in-sample profit falls to about +$243 and the pair rule leads by roughly $187. So what do the learned rules actually buy? Look at the COMBINED row: 68.4% win rate against the base's 63.2%, and a worst drawdown of -$25 instead of -$50. The rules buy smoothness and drawdown control — not proven extra profit. Anyone selling you a filter that "beats the market" on the data it was built from is showing you the practised exam.
| Out-of-sample — opened Oct 30 – Nov 2, 2026 (the rules never saw these) | Trades taken | W / L | Win rate | Final balance | P/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BASE — the raw copy sim, unfiltered | 5 | 4 / 1 | 80.0% | $1,019.84 | +$19.84 |
| R1 — mid-band only | 2 | 2 / 0 | 100% | $1,031.99 | +$31.99 |
| R2 — no longshots to resolution | 4 | 4 / 0 | 100% | $1,044.84 | +$44.84 |
| R3 — CS2-whitelist esports | 1 | 1 / 0 | 100% | $1,008.78 | +$8.78 |
| R4 — cheaper side of pairs | 5 | 4 / 1 | 80.0% | $1,019.84 | +$19.84 |
| COMBINED (R1 + R4) | 2 | 2 / 0 | 100% | $1,031.99 | +$31.99 |
Five trades is not a test — the combined rules took only 2 of the 5 and both happened to win, which validates nothing yet. That is exactly why the forward sim below exists. For reference, the full week (all 43 closed mirrors): BASE $1,416.64 (+$416.64) · R1 $1,274.45 (+$274.45) · R2 $1,281.60 (+$281.60) · R3 $1,216.40 (+$216.40) · R4 $1,449.97 (+$449.97) · COMBINED $1,282.78 (+$282.78 on 21 trades, 71.4% win rate).
The cross-check. As a second sample we replayed the raw whale activity feed the study pulled — 33 qualifying $500+ BUY signals, of which only 11 had clear exit evidence by pull time. On those 11: BASE $1,135.49 (+$135.49) · R1 $1,061.25 · R2 $1,060.83 · R3 $1,053.19 · R4 $1,135.91 · COMBINED $1,061.25 (+$61.25). The sample leans on a single trade (a whale selling a position at about 0.99) and shares its underlying activity with the mirror record, so it is a consistency check, not independent evidence.
The limits, all of them. About one week of data. The rules were learned partly from the same record they were backtested on (in-sample bias). Winner selection itself is biased — the watch list comes from a weekly profit leaderboard, so we only ever study wallets after a hot week. Fills in both the sim and the backtest are approximations; a real follower fills later and worse — the lagged Reality twin of the raw sim is at -$114.72, not +$416.64. And past performance, especially one week of it, does not predict future results.
The forward sim — the rules, live on paper
Paper record — not a copy feed| Forward rule | Detail |
|---|---|
| Signal | A watched wallet (same Monday-refreshed list as the Copy Sim) makes a TRADE BUY of $500 or more. Whale trades are the signal source only — our filters decide what we take. No backfill: only trades after the sim's Nov 2, 2026 start count. |
| F1 — mid-band only | The fill must land within 0.30–0.65 inclusive (rule R1). Outside the band: skip, and log the skip. |
| F2 — cheaper side of pairs | If both outcomes of one event signal in the same cycle, enter only the cheaper side (rule R4). If we already hold one side of an event, skip the other. |
| F3 — hygiene | Skip markets ending within 1 hour. Max 6 open. One position per event + outcome — no laddering in v1, so the test isolates the filters. |
| Size | $25 flat. Shares = 25 ÷ lagged fill. |
| The lag — every fill | Every entry is priced about 15 seconds after the whale's trade (the ask at whale-time + 15s, plus 1¢). This sim never gets the fantasy fill: it lives at follower speed, like the Reality twins. |
| Exits | Hold to resolution, or sell any position 7+ days old at the best bid minus 1¢. No early sells in v1. |
| Busted line | Cash + open positions at cost under $200 → BUSTED, final record stands. |
Trades
No trades yet — the sim started Nov 2, 2026. Every position the Learned Whale sim opens and closes will be listed here in full — whale, market, outcome, the whale's price, our lagged fill, the lag cost, the exit and the P/L — the same standard as the Copy Sim and Certainty pages. Until the first qualifying signal passes the filters, this section stays empty on purpose: an honest blank beats a backfilled record.